Butte County Superior Court Records
Search for public court records online in the Butte County Superior Court of California. Lookup the case information you need and search by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. Get access to the court dockets, court documents, transcripts, and legal data on the parties, attorneys, law firms, and judges involved in court cases in Butte County.
UniCourt’s case search gives you real-time access to a range of case types in California trial courts, including Civil Right, Contract, Criminal, Family, Forfeiture, Labor, Other, Personal Injury, Probate, Property, and Small Claim. Along with streamlined access to court data, you can also get the latest court docket information, obtain case summaries, check case statuses, download court documents, view tentative rulings, and track lawsuits to get real-time alerts on new case updates.
About the Butte County Superior Court
The Butte County Superior Court, or alternatively the Superior Court of California, County of Butte, has jurisdiction over Butte County, one of the original twenty-seven counties in California. It serves approximately 208,300 residents who live and work across the county’s 1,676 square miles.
The Court states that its mission is “to create a court environment deserving of community respect by resolving disputes according to law; ensuring and protecting peoples' rights; taking a leadership role in preserving order in society; and providing exceptional, accessible and fair justice services to all.”
The Butte County Superior Court is divided into six divisions including civil, criminal, family law, family court services, juvenile, and traffic courts. Currently, the Butte County Superior Court has eleven judges, two commissioners, and about 100 employees.
The Court operates out of two separate locations. The North Butte County Courthouse of the Butte County Superior Court is located at 1775 Concord Avenue, Chico, CA 95928, and can be reached by calling (530) 532-7009. This courthouse is a full-service, five-courtroom courthouse in the greater Chico area. The North Butte County Courthouse handles civil, probate, traffic, family law, and juvenile dependency cases.
The Butte County Courthouse is located at One Court Street, Oroville, CA 95965, and can be reached by calling (530) 532-7002. This courthouse handles criminal, juvenile, mental health cases, appeals, and family law cases as well as jury selection for criminal cases.
The Presiding Judge for the Butte County Superior Court is the Hon. Kimberly Merrifield.
The Court Executive Officer is the Hon. Sharif Elmallah. You can contact the Court Executive Officer by calling (530) 532-7013.
Butte County Superior Court Divisions
Civil/Probate Division
The Civil/Probate Division of the Butte County Superior Court is located at the North Butte County Courthouse. It handles all civil matters, including small claims, unlawful detainer, and limited and unlimited civil cases. This division also handles probate matters, including estate, guardianship, trust, and conservatorship cases for the whole county.
You can reach the Civil Limited Court and Civil Unlimited Court by calling (530) 532-7009. The Probate Court can be reached by calling (530) 532-7017.
Criminal Division
The Criminal Division handles criminal misdemeanor and felony matters for the entire county. It also handles cases that are specified penal code infraction matters.
You can reach the Criminal Division by calling (530) 532- 7011.
Family Law Division
The Family Law Division hears all family law matters, including the dissolution of marriage, legal separation, nullity, paternity, and summary dissolution. This division also hears the related issues of child custody and visitation, child and spousal support, and community property.
The Family Law Division is located at the North Butte County Courthouse and can be reached by calling (530) 532-7008.
Juvenile Division
The Juvenile Division of the Butte County Superior Court deals with matters involving juvenile delinquency, juvenile dependency, adoptions, and juvenile traffic violations. This division also handles any other types of juvenile infraction cases for the entire county.
You can reach the Juvenile Division by calling (530) 532-7010.
Traffic Division
The Traffic Division handles all adult traffic citations, including vehicle code infractions, municipal code infractions, and county ordinances.
The Traffic Division can be reached by calling (530) 532-7005.
Courthouses in Butte County Superior Court
Facts and Statistics
- The Butte County Superior Court was established in the early 1850s, not long after California achieved statehood.
- The County seat is Oroville, where the Butte County Courthouse is located.
- The Butte County Superior Court has been impacted by natural disasters in recent years, including the Camp Fire in 2018, which destroyed the court's Chico facility.
- According to the Judicial Council Report, there were a total of 20,770 criminal case filings in the 2020/2021 fiscal year, but more than 13,000 of those were traffic infractions.
Why use UniCourt to search for Butte County Superior Court Cases?
UniCourt is your single source for state and federal court records, offering comprehensive court coverage and the most complete and accurate dataset available.
Everyday of the week, UniCourt collects all of the newly filed civil and criminal cases in the Butte County Superior Courts and lets you search through those new case filings in our CrowdSourced Library™. You can also use UniCourt to track state court litigation and get real-time case alerts sent directly to your inbox. Further, UniCourt empowers you to download court documents on-demand without ever having to login to a government court database, and gives you unlimited access to download millions of free state and federal court documents in our CrowdSourced Library™.
In addition to the Butte County Superior Court, UniCourt provides you with access to other state courts across California, including many of the largest counties across the state, such as the Los Angeles County Superior Courts, the San Diego County Superior Courts, the Orange County Superior Courts, the Riverside County Superior Courts, and San Bernardino County Superior Courts.
UniCourt also gives you access to court records for all of the federal courts across the state of California, including the federal courts with jurisdiction over Butte County: the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
UniCourt’s industry-leading Legal Data APIs provide Enterprise users with on-demand, bulk access to structured data from California state and federal courts. Our Legal Data as a Service (LDaaS) collects, organizes, standardizes, and normalizes court data from California state courts and all federal courts, and makes it readily available via our UniCourt Enterprise API for business development, competitive intelligence, litigation strategy, and docket management.
Featured Court Records from Butte County Superior Court
Last updated on 5th October 2025, at 11:48 (UTC)
-
DOCKET
-
11/19/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; COMMENT: CONTINUED FROM 9/17/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/18/2025
-
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DISMISSAL; NOTICE OF ENTRY OF DISMISSAL AND PROOF OF SERVICE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/07/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
TENTATIVE RULING; COMMENT: THE DEMURRER IS SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION - RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY. DEFENDANT ACKNOWLEDGES A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR RETALIATION WOULD BE VIABLE (AT LEAST AT THIS STAGE OF THE PROCEEDING), AND THE ISSUE RAISED IN THE DEMURRER IS AS TO THE INCLUSION OF THE WORDS "IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY." IT IS ERROR FOR A TRIAL COURT TO SUSTAIN A DEMURRER WHEN PLAINTIFF HAS STATED A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER ANY POSSIBLE LEGAL THEORY. SEE AUBRY V. TRI-CITY HOSP. DIST. (1992) 2 CAL.4TH 962, 966. IN BARQUIS V. MERCHANTS COLLECTION ASSN. (1972) 7 CAL.3D 94 THE COURT STATED: "ALTHOUGH PLAINTIFFS GROUND THEIR REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF SOLELY ON THE BASIS OF CIVIL CODE SECTION 3369, HN2 WE ARE NOT LIMITED TO PLAINTIFFS' THEORY OF RECOVERY IN TESTING THE SUFFICIENCY OF THEIR COMPLAINT AGAINST A DEMURRER, BUT INSTEAD MUST DETERMINE IF THE FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT ARE ADEQUATE TO STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER ANY LEGAL THEORY. THE COURTS OF THIS STATE HAVE, OF COURSE, LONG SINCE DEPARTED FROM HOLDING A PLAINTIFF STRICTLY TO THE "FORM OF ACTION" HE HAS PLEADED AND INSTEAD HAVE ADOPTED THE MORE FLEXIBLE APPROACH OF EXAMINING THE FACTS ALLEGED TO DETERMINE IF A DEMURRER SHOULD BE SUSTAINED. (SEE, E.G., MACISAAC V. POZZO (1945) 26 CAL. 2D 809, 815 [161 P.2D 449]; ZELLNER V. WASSMAN (1920) 184 CAL. 80, 88 [193 P. 84]; 3 WITKIN, CAL. PROCEDURE (2D ED. 1971) PLEADING, 301, P. 1974.)" ID. AT 103. TO ESTABLISH A PRIMA FACIE CASE OF RETALIATION, A PLAINTIFF MUST SHOW THAT (YANOWITZ V. L'OREAL USA, INC. (2005) 36 CAL.4TH 1028): (1) THE PLAINTIFF WAS ENGAGED IN A PROTECTED ACTIVITY; (2) THE PLAINTIFF SUFFERED AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION; AND (3) THERE WAS A CAUSAL LINK BETWEEN THE ACTIVITY AND THE EMPLOYMENT DECISION. HERE, PLAINTIFF HAS SO ALLEGED. [SEE, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AT 28, 29, 30, 33, 70]. THUS, THE DEMURRER IS OVERRULED AS TO THE FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR RETALIATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY. SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION - FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE PHYSICAL DISABILITY IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY. ALTHOUGH DEFENDANTS CITE TO HERNANDEZ V. RANCHO SANTIAGO CMTY. COLLEGE DIST. (2018) 22 CAL.APP.5TH 1187, 1193-1194, THE ELEMENTS DIFFER SLIGHTLY FROM THOSE PROFFERED IN THE DEFENDANTS' MOTION. THE HERNANDEZ OPINION STATES: "THERE ARE THREE ELEMENTS TO A FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE ACTION: "(1) THE PLAINTIFF HAS A DISABILITY COVERED BY THE FEHA; (2) THE PLAINTIFF IS A QUALIFIED [*1194] INDIVIDUAL (I.E., HE OR SHE CAN PERFORM THE ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION); AND (3) THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE THE PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY. [CITATION.]" (WILSON V. COUNTY OF ORANGE (2009) 169 CAL.APP.4TH 1185, 1192 [87 CAL. RPTR. 3D 439].) THE DISTRICT DOES NOT DISPUTE HERNANDEZ HAD A DISABILITY PROTECTED BY THE FEHA OR THAT SHE IS A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL. THE DISPUTED ISSUE IS WHETHER THE DISTRICT FAILED TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE HERNANDEZ'S DISABILITY. ID. AT 1193-1194. AS SUCH, THE THREE ELEMENTS REQUIRED FOR SUFFICIENT PLEADING OF A FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE CAUSE OF ACTION ARE: (1) THE PLAINTIFF HAS A DISABILITY COVERED BY THE FEHA; (2) THE PLAINTIFF IS A QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL (I.E., HE OR SHE CAN PERFORM THE ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS OF THE POSITION); AND (3) THE EMPLOYER FAILED TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE THE PLAINTIFF'S DISABILITY. HOWEVER, THE COURT AGREES WITH THE DEFENDANTS THAT IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT ACCOMMODATION WAS REQUESTED, AS THE ALLEGATION IN PARAGRAPH 85 STATES IN A CONCLUSORY FASHION THAT "PLAINTIFF REQUESTED THAT TNRTEC MAKE A REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR HER PHYSICAL DISABILITY SO THAT SHE WOULD BE ABLE TO PERFORM THE ESSENTIAL JOB REQUIREMENTS", WITHOUT FURTHER SPECIFICS. THE COURT CONCLUDES THAT IN REGARD TO THIS CAUSE OF ACTION, THE PLEADING IS SO UNINTELLIGIBLE THE RESPONDING PARTY CANNOT REASONABLY RESPOND, GIVEN THAT THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT ACCOMMODATION WAS REQUESTED AND THEREFORE CANNOT DETERMINE WHETHER THEY FAILED TO MAKE SUCH ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE, KHOURY V. MALY'S OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (1993) 14 CAL.APP.4TH 612, 616. THE DEMURRER IS SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AS TO THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FAILURE TO ACCOMMODATE PHYSICAL DISABILITY IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY. SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN A GOOD FAITH INTERACTIVE PROCESS IN VIOLATION OF GOVERNMENT CODE 12940(N). FEHA REQUIRES THAT "IN RESPONSE TO A REQUEST FOR REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION BY AN EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT WITH A KNOWN PHYSICAL OR MENTAL DISABILITY OR KNOWN MEDICAL CONDITION, AN EMPLOYER ENGAGE IN A TIMELY, GOOD FAITH, INTERACTIVE PROCESS WITH THE EMPLOYEE OR APPLICANT TO DETERMINE EFFECTIVE REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS, IF ANY." SHIRVANYAN V. LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST. (2020) 59 CAL.APP.5TH 82, 88-89 (EMPHASIS ADDED). AS DISCUSSED ABOVE, PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO ALLEGE ANY FACTS SUGGESTING SHE REQUESTED AN ACCOMMODATION FOR A DISABILITY. THE DEMURRER IS SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND AS TO THE SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - FAILURE TO ENGAGE IN A GOOD FAITH INTERACTIVE PROCESS IN VIOLATION OF GOVERNMENT CODE 12940(N). EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION - HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT IN VIOLATION OF GOV'T CODE 12940 ET SEQ. A PLAINTIFF MAY PLEAD BOTH HARASSMENT AND HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CAUSES OF ACTION, AS THEY ARE NOT INHERENTLY DUPLICATIVE BUT RATHER DISTINCT LEGAL THEORIES UNDER FEHA. HARASSMENT FOCUSES ON THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT OF THE WORKPLACE AND THE COMMUNICATION OF AN OFFENSIVE OR HOSTILE MESSAGE, WHILE A HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIM IS A SPECIFIC TYPE OF HARASSMENT THAT ARISES WHEN THE CONDUCT IS SEVERE OR PERVASIVE ENOUGH TO ALTER THE CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT AND CREATE AN ABUSIVE WORKING ENVIRONMENT. GOVERNMENT CODE 12923, ROBY V. MCKESSON CORP., 47 CAL.4TH 686, POLLOCK V. TRI-MODAL DISTRIBUTION SERVICES, INC., 11 CAL.5TH 918. THE COURT FINDS THAT HERE, PLAINTIFF'S FIFTH AND EIGHTH CAUSES OF ACTION ARE DUPLICATIVE, BASED ON THE SAME FACTS AND ALLEGED HARASSMENT. HOWEVER, BECAUSE PLAINTIFF INDICATES IN THE OPPOSITION THAT THERE MAY BE OTHER FACTS (E.G., HARASSMENT OF OTHERS) THAT COULD BE INCLUDED AS SPECIFIC TO A HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CAUSE OF ACTION, THE DEMURRER TO THE EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION - HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT IN VIOLATION OF GOV'T CODE 12940 ET SEQ. IS SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION - FAILURE TO PROMOTE THE COURT AGREES WITH THE DEFENDANTS, THAT FEHA DOES NOT RECOGNIZE "FAILURE TO PROMOTE" AS AN INDEPENDENT CAUSE OF ACTION. SUCH AN ALLEGATION, IF ACTIONABLE, IS PROPERLY PLED AS AN ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION SUPPORTING A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DISCRIMINATION OR RETALIATION UNDER THE FEHA. SEE JONES V. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION (2007) 152 CAL.APP.4TH 1367, 1380 [ADVERSE EMPLOYMENT ACTION INCLUDES HIRING, FIRING, DEMOTION OR FAILURE TO PROMOTE.] THE DEMURRER TO THE NINTH CAUSE OF ACTION - FAILURE TO PROMOTE IS SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - WRONGFUL CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF FEHA PLAINTIFF PROVIDES NO SPECIFIC STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR A SEPARATE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR "WRONGFUL CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF THE FEHA", NOR COULD THIS COURT FIND ANY SUCH AUTHORITY. GOVERNMENT CODE 12940-12953. TO THE EXTENT IT IS ALLEGED AS A COMMON LAW CLAIM FOR WRONGFUL CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY UNDER TAMENY V. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. (1980) 27 CAL.3D 167, 178, 164 CAL. RPTR. 839, 610 P.2D 1330), THE COURT FINDS THAT DEFENDANTS, AS A GOVERNMENT ENTITY, ARE IMMUNE FROM COMMON LAW TORT LIABILITY. SEE, GOVERNMENT CODE 815(A); SEE ALSO, MIKLOSY V. REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (2008) 44 CAL.4TH 876, 899. THE DEMURRER TO THE TENTH CAUSE OF ACTION - WRONGFUL CONSTRUCTIVE TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF FEHA IS SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION - HARASSMENT DUE TO PHYSICAL DISABILITY (AS TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL CROSS ONLY) THE COURT FINDS THAT THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FAILS TO ALLEGE FACTS SUPPORTING A HARASSMENT CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST DEFENDANT MICHAEL CROSS, SPECIFICALLY THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FAILS TO ALLEGE ANY FACTS TO SUGGEST THAT DEFENDANT MICHAEL CROSS ENGAGED IN "HARASSMENT" AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED FOR PURPOSES OF FEHA VIOLATIONS. THE DEMURRER TO THE FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION IS SUSTAINED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. AS INDICATED ABOVE, THE COURT HAS IN PART GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND. ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE FILED AND SERVED WITHIN 10 DAYS' NOTICE OF THIS ORDER. COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANTS SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A REVISED FORM OF ORDER CONSISTENT WITH THIS RULING WITHIN TWO WEEKS.
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
12/10/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/18/2025
-
ANSWER - RESPONSE - DENIAL - UNLIMITED; DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
10/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: DAMAGES; AMOUNT: $1497.79; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $181.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 10/01/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
10/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $181.0; REMEDY: DAMAGES; AMOUNT: $1166.7
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 10/01/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
09/30/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: ACCOUNT STATED
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
09/30/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: OPEN BOOK ACCOUNT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/CROSS-COMPLAINT AS TO MJ SHELTON GENERAL ENGINEERING INC; PLAINTIFFS' CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; CROSS-DEFENDANT MJ SHELTON GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC'S ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT; CAROLYN CORDES' CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; MJ SHELTON GENERAL ENGINEERING INC'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/25/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; MJ SHELTON GENERAL ENGINEERING INC'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
02/04/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; COMMENT: CONTINUED FROM 10/1/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT; ANSWER/RESPONSE/DENIAL; CROSS COMPLAINT (NO FEE); FIRST AMENDED CROSS COMPLAINT - NO FEE; PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO SECOND AMENDED CROSS-COMPLAINT; DEFENDANT'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; PLAINTIFF'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; RESULT: HELD; PLAINTIFF; ATTORNEY: GRIFFITH, DAVID RICHARD; DEFENDANT; RETAINED COUNSEL: POWER, STACIE LYNN
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
11/03/2025
-
COURT TRIAL; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM; COMMENT: ONE-HOUR TIME ESTIMATE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/29/2025
-
TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:00 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/14/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; COMMENT: CONTINUED FROM 10/1/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
MINUTE ORDER; CIVIL MINUTES
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
12/03/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT; DEFENDANT'S ANSWER; STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER - CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATION ONLY; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
PROOF OF MAILING
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/26/2025
-
DECLARATION; COMMENT: DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF CALCULATIONS OF ACCRUED INTEREST & ATTORNEY FEES
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/26/2025
-
DECLARATION; COMMENT: DECLARATION RE ACCEPTING COPIES IN LIEU OF ORIGINALS
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/29/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/11/2025
-
DECLARATION OF NON-SERVICE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/25/2025
-
PROOF OF MAILING
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/04/2025
-
DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY COURT; DEFAULT JUDGMENT BY COURT; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
04/14/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
04/04/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: MONEY- DAMAGES SOUGHT; AMOUNT: $6343.48; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $225.0
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
04/04/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: MONEY- DAMAGES SOUGHT; AMOUNT: $3161.94; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $181.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
04/04/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 04/04/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
05/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: MONEY- DAMAGES SOUGHT; AMOUNT: $2329.97; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $181.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 05/01/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
07/15/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
06/16/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: MONEY- DAMAGES SOUGHT; AMOUNT: $14456.55; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $370.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/07/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ANSWER TO COMPLAINT; STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/24/2025
-
PROOF OF MAILING
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
10/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: DAMAGES; AMOUNT: $5364.98; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $225.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 10/01/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/02/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE; UNSERVED
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
07/30/2025
-
DECLARATION; DECLARATION RE: VENUE; COMMENT: DECLARATION RE: VENUE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/05/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/02/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE; SERVED: 08/31/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
03/18/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/24/2025
-
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
12/17/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/25/2025
-
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
03/25/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/03/2025
-
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/10/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/01/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE; SERVED: 09/09/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
09/29/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: DAMAGES; AMOUNT: $11879.73; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $370.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/29/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 09/29/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/02/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/01/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE; SERVED: 08/30/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
09/09/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: DAMAGES; AMOUNT: $5592.84; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $225.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/09/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 09/09/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
07/25/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $370.0; REMEDY: MONEY- DAMAGES SOUGHT; AMOUNT: $10901.81
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
07/25/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 07/25/2025
[-] Read Less
-
CAUSE OF ACTION
-
09/29/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION: CONTRACT; TYPE: ACTION; DESCRIPTION: BREACH OF CONTRACT; REMEDY: DAMAGES; AMOUNT: $8351.75; REMEDY: COURT COSTS; AMOUNT: $225.0
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/29/2025
-
CAUSE OF ACTION; ACTION CONTRACT; FILE DATE 09/29/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/02/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS FILED; PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS/COMPLAINT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
07/25/2025
-
PROOF OF SERVICE; SERVED: 08/29/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/06/2025
-
COURT TRIAL; NOTICE OF COURT TRIAL; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM; CANCEL REASON: VACATED; COMMENT: 1-HOUR TIME ESTIMATE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE; NOTICE OF TRIAL READINESS CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:00 AM; COMMENT: 1-HOUR TIME ESTIMATE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/28/2023
-
PROOF OF MAILING
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/28/2023
-
ORDER ON FEE WAIVER - GRANTED
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/09/2003
-
PROGRESS REPORT; COMMENT: PROBATION/DIVERSION/PROGRESS REPORT FEE TYPE: NBR COPIES/FORMS/DEFTS: 0 NBR OF CERTIFICATIONS: 0 FEE AMOUNT: 0.00 ENTRY CLERK: AHM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/09/2003
-
NOTICE; COMMENT: NOTICE TO COMPLIANCE (PC 987.8 FEES) FEE TYPE: NBR COPIES/FORMS/DEFTS: 0 NBR OF CERTIFICATIONS: 0 FEE AMOUNT: 0.00 ENTRY CLERK: CCD
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/22/2016
-
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MERRIFIELD, KIMBERLY; HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM; CANCEL REASON: VACATED; COMMENT: FOR STATUS OF CDL
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/16/2016
-
ARREST DISPOSITION RECORD JUS8715 OR 8716
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/03/2023
-
COLLECTIONS - REFERRED TO BUTTE COUNTY CENTRAL COLLECTIONS; COMMENT: $259
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/03/2023
-
NOTICE OF TRANSFER TO COLLECTIONS
[-] Read Less
-
DISPOSITION
-
06/16/2023
-
DISPOSITION; JUDICIAL OFFICER: WORLEY, KURT W; 001; VC23152(F)-M- DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ANY DRUG OTHER THAN CANNABIS; DISMISSAL; 002; HS11377(A)-M- POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE; DISMISSAL
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
06/16/2023
-
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR CASE DISPOSITION; JUDICIAL OFFICER: WORLEY, KURT W
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
03/18/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMPLAINT; NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/30/2025
-
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: BENSON, STEPHEN E
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/14/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; COMMENT: CONTINUED FROM 10/1/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT, ORDER OR RULING; NOTICE OF RULING REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; COMMENT: NOTICE OF RULING REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
02/04/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; COMMENT: CONTINUED FROM 10/1/2025
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
MINUTE ORDER; CIVIL MINUTES
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
11/02/2023
-
REVIEW HEARING; JUDICIAL OFFICER: KEITHLEY, CLARE; HEARING TIME: 1:35 PM; COMMENT: ANNUAL REVIEW
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/15/2023
-
POST-MOVE NOTICE OF CHANGE OF RESIDENCE
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/04/2023
-
REVIEW HEARING; JUDICIAL OFFICER: KEITHLEY, CLARE; HEARING TIME: 1:35 PM; COMMENT: ANNUAL REVIEW
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/05/2022
-
MINUTE ORDER
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
02/16/2023
-
REVIEW HEARING; JUDICIAL OFFICER: KEITHLEY, CLARE; HEARING TIME: 1:35 PM; COMMENT: ANNUAL REVIEW
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
02/17/2022
-
REVIEW HEARING; JUDICIAL OFFICER: GIORDANO, RAYMOND J; HEARING TIME: 1:35 PM; CANCEL REASON: VACATED; COMMENT: ANNUAL REVIEW; CONTINUED 12/16/2021
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/08/2025
-
COURT TRIAL; JUDICIAL OFFICER: GINGERY, VIRGINIA; HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM; COMMENT: DAY 3 - FULL DAY
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/07/2025
-
COURT TRIAL; JUDICIAL OFFICER: GINGERY, VIRGINIA; HEARING TIME: 8:30 AM; COMMENT: DAY 2 - AM ONLY
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/15/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; PBM SUPPLY & MFG INC'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; PLAINTIFF'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
09/30/2025
-
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT; PLAINTIFF'S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
01/07/2026
-
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MOSBARGER, TAMARA L; HEARING TIME: 10:30 AM; COMMENT: CONTINUED FROM 10/1/2025 FOR STATUS OF MEDIATION
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
10/01/2025
-
MINUTE ORDER; CIVIL MINUTES
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/11/2018
-
COLLECTIONS - REFERRED TO BUTTE COUNTY CENTRAL COLLECTIONS; COMMENT: $520.00
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
05/11/2018
-
NOTICE OF CIVIL ASSESSMENT
[-] Read Less
-
DISPOSITION
-
03/20/2025
-
TERMINAL SENTENCE; 001; VC12500(A)-M- UNLAWFUL TO DRIVE UNLESS LICENSED; TERMINAL SENTENCE; 003; VC40508(A)-M- VIOLATION OF PROMISE TO APPEAR, PROMISE TO PAY; TERMINAL SENTENCE
[-] Read Less
-
DISPOSITION
-
03/20/2025
-
DISPOSITION; JUDICIAL OFFICER: MERRIFIELD, KIMBERLY; 001; VC12500(A)-M- UNLAWFUL TO DRIVE UNLESS LICENSED; SENTENCED-PLEA OF GUILTY/NOLO; 002; VC4000(A)-I- REGISTRATION REQUIRED; DISMISSAL - HARVEY WAIVER; 003; VC40508(A)-M- VIOLATION OF PROMISE TO APPEAR, PROMISE TO PAY; SENTENCED-PLEA OF GUILTY/NOLO
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/24/2022
-
COLLECTIONS - REFERRED TO BUTTE COUNTY CENTRAL COLLECTIONS; COMMENT: $224
[-] Read Less
-
DOCKET
-
08/24/2022
-
NOTICE OF TRANSFER TO COLLECTIONS
[-] Read Less