Fifth Appellate District Court Records

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED. SNAUFFER, DESANTOS, ELLISON; 17 PAGES.; PUBLICATION STATUS: BY THE COURT - UNPUBLISHED; PARTICIPANTS: SNAUFFER, MARK W. (CONCUR) DESANTOS, THOMAS (CONCUR) ELLISON, WAYNE R. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: OPINION FILED.; NOTES: (BY THE COURT - UNPUBLISHED) THE JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED. SNAUFFER, DESANTOS, ELLISON; 17 PAGES.

DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED IN FULL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER IS AFFIRMED. MUNOZ IS AWARDED HER COSTS ON APPEAL.; FAIN, DETJEN, PE A; 10 PAGES; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: FAIN, GREGORY T.; PARTICIPANTS: DETJEN, JENNIFER R.S. (CONCUR) PENA, JR., ROSENDO (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: OPINION FILED.; NOTES: (SIGNED UNPUBLISHED) THE TRIAL COURT'S ORDER IS AFFIRMED. MUNOZ IS AWARDED HER COSTS ON APPEAL.; FAIN, DETJEN, PE A; 10 PAGES

DESCRIPTION: RECEIVED COPY OF DOCUMENT FILED IN TRIAL COURT; NOTES: CERTIFIED COPY OF MINUTE ORDER DATED 8/11/25 AND AMENDED ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REVERSED IN FULL, RETRIAL PERMITTED; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL THE ORDER DENYING OROPEZA'S PETITION IS REVERSED, AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE TRIAL COURT FOR A NEW EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON THE PETITION. ON REMAND, THE PARTIES MAY INTRODUCE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE. WE EXPRESS NO VIEW ON HOW THE PETITION SHOULD BE DECIDED. SNAUFFER, FRANSON & PENA (13 PAGES); PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: SNAUFFER, MARK W.; PARTICIPANTS: FRANSON, JR., DONALD R. (CONCUR) PENA, JR., ROSENDO (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: OPINION FILED.; NOTES: (SIGNED UNPUBLISHED) THE ORDER DENYING OROPEZA'S PETITION IS REVERSED, AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE TRIAL COURT FOR A NEW EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON THE PETITION. ON REMAND, THE PARTIES MAY INTRODUCE ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE. WE EXPRESS NO VIEW ON HOW THE PETITION SHOULD BE DECIDED. SNAUFFER, FRANSON & PENA (13 PAGES)

DESCRIPTION: REVERSED & REMANDED TO TRIAL COURT W/DIRECTIONS; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL VALDEZ'S CONVICTION IS REVERSED. THE PEOPLE MAY CHOOSE TO RETRY VALDEZ ON THIS CHARGE. (PEOPLE V. HERNANDEZ (2003) 30 CAL. 4TH 1, 10 ["THE LAW IS CLEAR THAT, AS A GENERAL RULE, ERRORS OTHER THAN INSUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE DO NOT PRECLUDE RETRIAL FOLLOWING REVERSAL OF CONVICTION"].) THE MATTER IS REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION. FRANSON, SNAUFFER, ELLISON; 16 PAGES.; PUBLICATION STATUS: SIGNED UNPUBLISHED; AUTHOR: ELLISON, WAYNE R.; PARTICIPANTS: SNAUFFER, MARK W. (CONCUR) FRANSON, JR., DONALD R. (CONCUR)

DESCRIPTION: OPINION FILED.; NOTES: (SIGNED UNPUBLISHED) VALDEZ'S CONVICTION IS REVERSED. THE PEOPLE MAY CHOOSE TO RETRY VALDEZ ON THIS CHARGE. (PEOPLE V. HERNANDEZ (2003) 30 CAL. 4TH 1, 10 ["THE LAW IS CLEAR THAT, AS A GENERAL RULE, ERRORS OTHER THAN INSUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE DO NOT PRECLUDE RETRIAL FOLLOWING REVERSAL OF CONVICTION"].) THE MATTER IS REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION. FRANSON, SNAUFFER, ELLISON; 16 PAGES.

DESCRIPTION: ORDER ON MOTION FILED.; NOTES: THE OPPOSED "MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE APPEALS ...," FILED BY TULARE MEDICAL CENTER PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION ON AUGUST 22, 2025, IS DENIED. THE DENIAL OF THE MOTION DOES NOT PREVENT THIS COURT FROM CONSIDERING THE APPEALS IN CASE NOS. F089448 AND F090150 TOGETHER OR SUBSEQUENTLY CONSOLIDATING THE APPEALS ON ITS OWN MOTION. APPELLANTS' OPENING BRIEF REMAINS DUE FOR FILING ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 13, 2025.

DESCRIPTION: OPPOSITION FILED.; NOTES: SUBMITTED BY ATTY STATLER OBO APPELLANTS

DESCRIPTION: CALENDAR NOTICE SENT ELECTRONICALLY. CALENDAR DATE:; NOTES: NOVEMBER 4, 2025, AT 01:30 PM

DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT FILED BY:; NOTES: RESP CSL PETERSEN - PA/VC/30 MINS - NOVEMBER 11, 13-14, 18, 20-21

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT ADVISING THAT AUGMENTED RECORD HAS BEEN FILED.; NOTES: AOB DUE W/IN 15 DAYS

DESCRIPTION: FILED PROOF OF SERVICE.; NOTES: AS TO AUGMENT RECORD FILED 9/24/25

DESCRIPTION: LETTER BRIEF FILED.; NOTES: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ATTORNEY: KELLI ROXANNE FALK NO RESPONDENT'S BRIEF WILL BE FILED

BRIEF: LETTER BRIEF FILED.; PARTY ATTORNEY: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: KERN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICESATTORNEY: KELLI ROXANNE FALK; NOTES: NO RESPONDENT'S BRIEF WILL BE FILED

DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.; NOTES: FOR RESPONDENT KIMBERLY BELL WITH NO FORWARDING ADDRESS

DESCRIPTION: REQUEST FILED TO:; NOTES: FOR COPY OF CLERK'S TRANSCRIPT SUBMITTED BY GARY BELL; CTX SENT VIA EMAIL

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: ANTHONY GENE HODGE ATTORNEY: RITA KATHRYN HIMES

BRIEF: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; DUE DATE: 11/03/2025; PARTY ATTORNEY: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: THE PEOPLEATTORNEY: MAX FEINSTAT

DESCRIPTION: REPLY FILED TO:; NOTES: AG'S RESPONSE FILED TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FILING PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S ORDER FILED 8/25/25

DESCRIPTION: RESPONSE FILED TO:; NOTES: APPELLANT'S "MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTIVE FILING" BY AG FEINSTAT OBO RESPONDENT PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S ORDER FILED 8/25/25

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED. DUE ON 10/29/2025 BY 20 DAY(S) 1ST REQUEST

DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; NOTES: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: THE PEOPLE ATTORNEY: WILLIAM K. KIM

DESCRIPTION: ORAL ARGUMENT WAIVER NOTICE SENT.

DESCRIPTION: CASE FULLY BRIEFED.

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF. DUE ON 11/03/2025 BY 31 DAY(S) 1ST REQUEST

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: D. P. ATTORNEY: CANDICE L. CHRISTENSEN

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF. DUE ON 10/22/2025 BY 30 DAY(S) 1ST REQUEST

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: TOULUVYA LASTER ATTORNEY: LINDSEY MARIA BALL

DESCRIPTION: FILED ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL (C.C.A.P. REVIEW).; NOTES: ATTORNEY WATTS APPOINTED FOR APPLT. SHAREEF; AOB DUE W/30 DAYS

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: DEAR ABDUR SHAREEF: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF WAS DUE FOR FILING ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2025, BUT HAS YET TO BE FILED AS COUNSEL HAS NOT BEEN APPOINTED IN THE MATTER. YOU HAVE ALREADY COMPLETED AN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROGRAM (CCAP) IS IN THE PROCESS OF PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION OF COUNSEL FOR YOUR APPEAL. BRIEFING IS STAYED PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. THIS COURT WILL LIKELY ISSUE AN ORDER APPOINTING APPELLATE COUNSEL AND REINSTATING BRIEFING ONCE COUNSEL IS APPOINTED. YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION AT THIS TIME.

DESCRIPTION: GRANTED - EXTENSION OF TIME.; NOTES: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF. DUE ON 11/03/2025 BY 31 DAY(S) 4TH REQUEST

DESCRIPTION: REQUESTED - EXTENSION OF TIME; NOTES: 4TH REQUEST

DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; NOTES: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: FRESNO CO. DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES ATTORNEY: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL

BRIEF: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED.; DUE DATE: 10/22/2025; PARTY ATTORNEY: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: M. H.ATTORNEY: LAUREN KELLY JOHNSON

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: NATHAN JOSEPH RYAN ATTORNEY: ELISA A. BRANDES

BRIEF: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; DUE DATE: 11/03/2025; PARTY ATTORNEY: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: THE PEOPLEATTORNEY: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: DEAR RANDY AUSBORN: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF WAS DUE FOR FILING ON 09/29/25 BUT HAS YET TO BE FILED AS COUNSEL HAS NOT BEEN APPOINTED IN THE MATTER. YOU HAVE ALREADY COMPLETED AN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROGRAM (CCAP) IS IN THE PROCESS OF PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION OF COUNSEL FOR YOUR APPEAL. BRIEFING IS STAYED PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. THIS COURT WILL LIKELY ISSUE AN ORDER APPOINTING APPELLATE COUNSEL AND REINSTATING BRIEFING ONCE COUNSEL IS APPOINTED. YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION AT THIS TIME.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; NOTES: PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT: KERN CO. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES ATTORNEY: OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL

BRIEF: APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF FILED.; DUE DATE: 10/13/2025; PARTY ATTORNEY: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: T. M.ATTORNEY: BETH SEARS

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT: JASMINE POTTS PRO PER

BRIEF: RESPONDENT'S BRIEF.; DUE DATE: 10/30/2025; PARTY ATTORNEY: DEFENDANT AND RESPONDENT: KERN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITYATTORNEY: JAY ALAN HIEATT

DESCRIPTION: FILED ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL (C.C.A.P. REVIEW).; NOTES: ATTORNEY WEINBERG OBO APPELLANT CHAVEZ - AOB DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: DEAR : MANUEL CHAVEZ APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF WAS DUE FOR FILING ON MAY 8, 2025, BUT HAS YET TO BE FILED AS COUNSEL HAS NOT BEEN APPOINTED IN THE MATTER. YOU HAVE ALREADY COMPLETED AN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROJECT (CCAP) IS IN THE PROCESS OF PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION OF COUNSEL FOR YOUR APPEAL. BRIEFING IS STAYED PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. THIS COURT WILL LIKELY ISSUE AN ORDER APPOINTING APPELLATE COUNSEL AND REINSTATING BRIEFING ONCE COUNSEL IS APPOINTED. YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION AT THIS TIME.

DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED, UNABLE TO FORWARD.; NOTES: AOB LETTER DATED 9/11/25 TO APPELLANT (RETURNED BY USPS MARKED AS RETURN TO SENDER, ATTEMPTED NOT KNOWN, UNABLE TO FORWARD); AOB DATE RESET FOR 30 ADDITIONAL DAYS.

DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED AND RE-SENT.; NOTES: TO TRIAL COURT'S CURRENT ADDRESS ON FILE FOR APPLT. (LETTER DATED 9/11/25) EXTENDED AOB 30 DAYS FROM TODAY'S DATE

DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED AND RE-SENT.; NOTES: LETTER SENT ON 9/9/25 RE-SENT TO UPDATE ADDRESS.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT ADVISING RECORD ON APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED.; NOTES: AOB DUE W/IN 40 DAYS.

DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT NOTIFIED RE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE OPENING BRIEF.; NOTES: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: ISAIAH ELIAS GARCIA PRO PER DEAR APPELLANT: IF YOUR OPENING BRIEF IS NOT FILED WITH THIS COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE OR YOU DO NOT SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR THE DELAY IN FILING YOUR OPENING BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, THIS COURT MAY DISMISS YOUR APPEAL. (CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.360(C)(5).) YOU ARE REMINDED THAT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL TO REPRESENT YOU IN YOUR APPEAL. IF COUNSEL IS APPOINTED, COUNSEL WILL ENSURE YOUR OPENING BRIEF IS FILED. HOWEVER, BEFORE THIS COURT CAN CONSIDER WHETHER TO APPOINT COUNSEL FOR YOU, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ON APPEAL FORM TO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROGRAM (CCAP). IF YOU FAIL TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO CCAP, YOU WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL AND THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF YOUR APPEAL.

BRIEF: APPELLANT NOTIFIED RE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE OPENING BRIEF.; PARTY ATTORNEY: DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT: ISAIAH ELIAS GARCIAPRO PER; NOTES: DEAR APPELLANT: IF YOUR OPENING BRIEF IS NOT FILED WITH THIS COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE OR YOU DO NOT SHOW GOOD CAUSE FOR THE DELAY IN FILING YOUR OPENING BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE, THIS COURT MAY DISMISS YOUR APPEAL. (CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.360(C)(5).) YOU ARE REMINDED THAT YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL TO REPRESENT YOU IN YOUR APPEAL. IF COUNSEL IS APPOINTED, COUNSEL WILL ENSURE YOUR OPENING BRIEF IS FILED. HOWEVER, BEFORE THIS COURT CAN CONSIDER WHETHER TO APPOINT COUNSEL FOR YOU, YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL ON APPEAL FORM TO CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROGRAM (CCAP). IF YOU FAIL TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THE APPLICATION TO CCAP, YOU WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR COURT-APPOINTED COUNSEL AND THE FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE MAY RESULT IN THE DISMISSAL OF YOUR APPEAL.

DESCRIPTION: EMAIL RECEIVED FROM:; NOTES: CCAP; CCAP IS WORKING ON ASSIGNING AN ATTORNEY.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: APPELLANT CAIN; APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF WAS DUE FOR FILING ON JUNE 7, 2025 BUT HAS YET TO BE FILED AS COUNSEL HAS NOT BEEN APPOINTED IN THE MATTER. YOU HAVE ALREADY COMPLETED AN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROGRAM (CCAP) IS IN THE PROCESS OF PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION OF COUNSEL FOR YOUR APPEAL. BRIEFING IS STAYED PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. THIS COURT WILL LIKELY ISSUE AN ORDER APPOINTING APPELLATE COUNSEL AND REINSTATING BRIEFING ONCE COUNSEL IS APPOINTED. YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION AT THIS TIME.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN SUPREME COURT.; NOTES: ON 2/28/24 FRANSON/SMITH/SNAUFFER

DESCRIPTION: SERVICE COPY OF PETITION FOR REVIEW RECEIVED.; NOTES: ON 1/22/24 S283514

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: DEAR APPELLANT: APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF WAS DUE FOR FILING ON 8/5/25 BUT HAS YET TO BE FILED AS COUNSEL HAS NOT BEEN APPOINTED IN THE MATTER. YOU HAVE ALREADY COMPLETED AN APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA APPELLATE PROGRAM (CCAP) IS IN THE PROCESS OF PROVIDING A RECOMMENDATION OF COUNSEL FOR YOUR APPEAL. BRIEFING IS STAYED PENDING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL. THIS COURT WILL LIKELY ISSUE AN ORDER APPOINTING APPELLATE COUNSEL AND REINSTATING BRIEFING ONCE COUNSEL IS APPOINTED. YOU DO NOT NEED TO TAKE ANY ACTION AT THIS TIME.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT ADVISING RECORD ON APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED.; NOTES: AOB DUE WITHIN 40 DAYS

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: OTHER INVOLUNTARY DISMISSAL; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: *** PAPER DOCUMENTS OK TO DESTORY7 AS OF 05/17/24 *** VERIFIED ALL DOCUMENTS SCANNED AND ATTACHED TO DOCKET. ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS PLACED IN SHREDDING BIN.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: PETITIONER: THE COURT HAS RECEIVED YOUR MOTION FOR SANCTIONS DATED NOVEMBER 29, 2023. YOUR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED ON FEBRUARY 24, 2023, WAS DENIED ON MAY 17, 2023. THE ORDER WAS FINAL, AS TO THIS COURT, UPON THE FILING OF THE DENIAL ORDER. THIS COURT THEREFORE NO LONGER HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE MATTER. (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.387(B)(2)(A).)

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT ADVISING RECORD ON APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED.; NOTES: AOB IS DUE WITHIN 40 DAYS.

DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL FILED.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN SUPREME COURT.; NOTES: ON 3/19/2025; DETJEN/MEEHAN/DESANTOS

DESCRIPTION: SERVICE COPY OF PETITION FOR REVIEW RECEIVED.; NOTES: BY PETITIONER DAVID RAYMOND ANDREWS IN PRO PER - CASE #S289226

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: PAPER DOCUMENTS TO BE DESTROYED AS OF THIS DATE CONFIRMED ALL PAGES SCANNED/ATTACHED TO DOCKET PLACED IN SHRED BIN

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN SUPREME COURT.; NOTES: ON 12/31/24 BEFORE LEVY, A.P.J., SMITH, J. AND SNAUFFER

DESCRIPTION: EMAIL RECEIVED FROM:; NOTES: MERY AT SUREME CT. PLEASE EMAIL ME A COPY OF MR. ALLEN'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND DOCUMENTS FILED IN THIS CASE

DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED AND RE-SENT.; NOTES: 5/22/25 ORDER RETURNED ON 6/9/25 RE-MAILED TO PETNR. AND NEW ADDRESS IN SOLEDAD (PER ADDRESS ON NEW WRIT F090002

DESCRIPTION: MODIFIED CRIMINAL ADDRESS.; NOTES: FOR TYLER JAMES SUONG, DUE TO CLERICAL ERROR OLD ADDRESS 1: P.O. BOX 705 VACAVILLE 95696 CORRECTED ADDRESS CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY P.O. BOX 705 SOLEDAD 93960

DESCRIPTION: NOTE:; NOTES: *** PAPER DOCUMENTS DESTROYED AS OF 4/23/24*** VERIFIED ALL DOCUMENTS WERE SCANNED AND ATTACHED TO DOCKET. ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS PLACED IN SHREDDING BIN.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT TO:; NOTES: JAIME ESTRADA: THE COURT HAS RECEIVED YOUR "SUPPLEMENTAL TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE" DOCUMENT REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION. YOUR PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FILED ON APRIL 11, 2023, WAS DENIED ON APRIL 20, 2023, AND WAS FINAL UPON FILING OF THE DENIAL ORDER. THIS COURT THEREFORE NO LONGER HAS JURISDICTION OVER THE MATTER. (CAL. RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.387(B)(2)(A).)

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: REMITTITUR ISSUED.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: SERVICE COPY OF PETITION FOR REVIEW RECEIVED.; NOTES: S277752

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: PETITION SUMMARILY DENIED BY ORDER; DISPOSITION TYPE: FINAL

DESCRIPTION: CASE COMPLETE.

DESCRIPTION: LETTER SENT ADVISING RECORD ON APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED.; NOTES: AOB DUE W/40 DAYS

DESCRIPTION: FILED PROOF OF SERVICE.; NOTES: DATED 10/2/25; FOR RECORD FILED ON 10/3/25