Florida Courts of Appeal Records

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: RECORD ON APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL; 221 PAGES; ON BEHALF OF: CLERK, PALM BEACH

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON FILING FEE; DESCRIPTION: THE JURISDICTION OF THIS COURT WAS INVOKED BY FILING OF A NOTICE OF APPEAL IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL. THE $300.00 FILING FEE REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE RULE OF PROCEDURE AND SECTION 35.22(2)(A), FLORIDA STATUTES (2024), IS DUE AND PAYABLE REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. ORDERED SUA SPONTE THAT THE $300.00 FILING FEE OR AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 57.081 AND 57.085, FLORIDA STATUTES (2024), MUST BE FILED IN THIS COURT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. THE FEE MAY BE PAID ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE FLORIDA COURTS E-FILING PORTAL - SEE THE COURT'S WEBSITE FOR DETAILS. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITHIN THE TIME PRESCRIBED WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CAUSE AND MAY RESULT IN THE COURT SANCTIONING OF ANY PARTY, OR THE PARTY'S ATTORNEY, WHO HAS NOT PAID THE FILING FEE. THE ATTORNEY FILING THE NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS A DUTY TO TENDER THE FILING FEE TO THE APPELLATE COURT WHEN THE APPEAL IS INITIATED. SEE IN RE PAYMENT OF FILING FEES, 744 SO. 2D 1025 (FLA. 4TH DCA 1997). FAILURE OF THE ATTORNEY TO PAY WILL RESULT IN REFERRAL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES FOR COLLECTION. **NOTE: THIS ORDER DOES NOT TOLL THE TIME FOR FILING ANY PLEADINGS NECESSARY TO PROSECUTE THIS APPEAL AND NO EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE ENTERTAINED. ONCE THE FEE IS PAID, IT IS NOT REFUNDABLE. EXCEPT FOR DISMISSAL, THIS COURT WILL TAKE NO ACTION IN THIS APPEAL UNTIL THE FILING FEE IS PAID OR UNTIL AN AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY IS FILED AND INDIGENCY STATUS IS GRANTED.

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: ORDER APPEALED; DESCRIPTION: ORDER APPEALED

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; DESCRIPTION: PAID CASE FILING FEE-300; ON BEHALF OF: FUNCOM LOAN, LLC

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL; ON BEHALF OF: TRIMINO, HAROL NUNEZ

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: LINGO, TAMEKA NICOLE

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE RE JURISDICTION; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT, WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, APPELLANT SHALL FILE IN THIS COURT A BRIEF STATEMENT EXPLAINING THE BASIS FOR THIS COURT'S SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE ORDER APPEALED IN THIS CASE, CITING SUPPORTING LEGAL AUTHORITIES. APPELLANT SHALL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS HOW THE AUGUST 8, 2025 "STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT" IS A FINAL APPEALABLE ORDER, AS THE ORDER DOES NOT ENTER JUDGMENT. SEE FLA. R. APP. P. 9.110; SEE CAUFIELD V. CANTELE, 837 SO. 2D 371, 375 (FLA. 2002) (FINDING THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IS ONE WHICH ENDS THE LITIGATION BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND DISPOSES OF ALL ISSUES INVOLVED SUCH THAT NO FURTHER ACTION BY THE COURT WILL BE NECESSARY); S.L.T. WAREHOUSE CO. V. WEBB, 304 SO. 2D 97, 99 (FLA. 1974) ("GENERALLY, THE TEST EMPLOYED BY THE APPELLATE COURT TO DETERMINE FINALITY OF AN ORDER, JUDGMENT OR DECREE IS WHETHER THE ORDER IN QUESTION CONSTITUTES AN END TO THE JUDICIAL LABOR IN THE CAUSE, AND NOTHING FURTHER REMAINS TO BE DONE BY THE COURT TO EFFECTUATE A TERMINATION OF THE CAUSE AS BETWEEN THE PARTIES DIRECTLY AFFECTED."); FURTHER, APPELLEE MAY FILE A RESPONSE WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF SERVICE OF THAT STATEMENT.

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: RECORD ON APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL; 107 PAGES; ON BEHALF OF: CLERK, BROWARD

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; DESCRIPTION: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; ON BEHALF OF: TOUSSAINT, ROAHSO

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: DETERMINATION OF INDIGENCY/LT ORDER INSOLVENCY; DESCRIPTION: DUPLICATE

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: DUPLICATE

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE RE JURISDICTION; DESCRIPTION: IT APPEARING THAT THE ORDER TO WHICH THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS DIRECTED IS A NON-APPEALABLE, NON-FINAL ORDER, APPELLANT(S) SHALL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO OBTAIN A FINAL ORDER AND TO FILE A COPY IN THIS COURT. FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL OF THE APPEAL. SEE FLA. R. APP. P. 9.110(L); DOBRICK V. DISCOVERY CRUISES, INC., 581 SO. 2D 645 (FLA. 4TH DCA 1991); SEE ALSO PAULINO V. BJ'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., 106 SO. 3D 985, 987 (FLA. 4TH DCA 2013) ("ON THE OTHER HAND, IT IS WELL-ESTABLISHED THAT AN ORDER WHICH MERELY GRANTS A MOTION TO DISMISS, AS CONTRASTED WITH AN ORDER DISMISSING A COMPLAINT OR AN ACTION, IS NOT A FINAL ORDER."). ORDERED THAT THE TRIAL COURT IS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.600(B), UPON APPROPRIATE APPLICATION, TO ENTER A FINAL ORDER IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; DESCRIPTION: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; ON BEHALF OF: FYK, JASON

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: RECORD ON APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: RECORD ON APPEAL; PAGES 1 TO 182; ON BEHALF OF: CLERK, PALM BEACH

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL; ON BEHALF OF: VALENZUELA, NIXZALIZ

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; DESCRIPTION: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; ON BEHALF OF: SETTLE, ROBERT, IV

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL; ON BEHALF OF: SECURITY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION TO APPEAR IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DESCRIPTION: CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF INDIGENCY THE CLERK OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT, HAS RECEIVED FOR FILING A MOTION TO BE RELIEVED OF COSTS, AN AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY, AND A CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL (IF REQUIRED), AND ISSUES THIS CERTIFICATE OF INDIGENCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 57.081(1), FLORIDA STATUTES (2024). THIS CASE SHALL PROCEED WITHOUT THE REQUIREMENT OF PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND COSTS, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 57.081(3), FLORIDA STATUTES (2024).

TYPE: MOTIONS OTHER; SUBTYPE: MOTION TO APPEAR FORMA PAUPERIS; DESCRIPTION: MOTION TO APPEAR FORMA PAUPERIS

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: AMENDED/ADDITIONAL FILING(S) NEEDED; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT IS DIRECTED TO FILE, WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, A CONFORMED COPY OF THE ORDER BEING APPEALED. SEE FLA. R. APP. P. 9.110(D). THIS COPY MUST CONTAIN A LEGIBLE STAMP FROM THE CLERK OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL, SHOWING THE DATE AND TIME THE ORDER BEING APPEALED WAS FILED IN THAT OFFICE.

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; DESCRIPTION: PAY CASE FILING FEE-300; ON BEHALF OF: NEWCOMER, MICHAEL

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL; ON BEHALF OF: NEWCOMER, MICHAEL

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: DETERMINATION OF INDIGENCY/LT ORDER INSOLVENCY; DESCRIPTION: DETERMINATION OF INDIGENCY/LT ORDER INSOLVENCY

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEAL; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEAL; ON BEHALF OF: WFG NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

TYPE: LETTER; SUBTYPE: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER; DESCRIPTION: ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RECORD; DESCRIPTION: THE BROWARD COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PREPARE THE RECORD ON APPEAL

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; ON BEHALF OF: WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT'S AUGUST 14, 2025 "MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.330(A)(2)(A),(B)" IS DENIED.

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEE, VICTORIA PRISTO'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING AND CLARIFICATION; ON BEHALF OF: PRISTO, VICTORIA

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEES' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: BECK, SARAH

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY; ON BEHALF OF: ALLIANCE RESIDENTIAL REALTY, LLC

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEES' RESPONSE TO APPELLANTS' REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT THIS COURT'S JULY 22, 2025 ORDER IS AMENDED TO CHANGE THE DATE OF ORAL ARGUMENT: THIS CASE IS SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON FRIDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2025, AT 10:00 A.M. FOR 20 MINUTES PER SIDE, IN PERSON AT THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL COURTHOUSE. IF A SIDE ANTICIPATES MORE THAN TWO ATTORNEYS SITTING AT COUNSEL TABLE DURING ORAL ARGUMENT, IT SHALL CONTACT THE MARSHAL'S OFFICE BY PHONE AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THE ORAL ARGUMENT SESSION. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT 4DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. IN CRIMINAL CASES WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E) OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6) OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, THE STATE SHALL PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE OR TIME.

TYPE: RECOGNIZING AGREED EXTENSION; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 30 DAYS TO OCTOBER 23, 2024

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: MASCARENHAS, EUGENE

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS', GEORGE BOTELHO AND INNA BOTELHO, RESPONSE TO APPELLEE'S, VERMONT SLATE COMPANY, LLC, MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; ON BEHALF OF: BOTELHO, GEORGE

TYPE: MOTIONS OTHER; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEE VERMONT SLATE COMPANY, LLC'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER DISPENSING WITH ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: AFTER REVIEWING THE BRIEFS, THE COURT, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.320, HAS DISPENSED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT. THE CASE WILL BE SUBMITTED TO A CONFERENCE BY A PANEL OF THE COURT.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; ON BEHALF OF: UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

TYPE: RECOGNIZING AGREED EXTENSION; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 30 DAYS TO OCTOBER 28, 2025

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER/CROSS-INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: SCHUMACHER, CHARLES A.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: VARONE, DANIEL

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT'S JUNE 4, 2025 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND APPELLANT SHALL SERVE THE REPLY BRIEF WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE THAT THE COURT RULES ON THE AMICUS MOTION. IN ADDITION, IF THE REPLY BRIEF IS SERVED AFTER THE TIME PROVIDED FOR IN THIS ORDER, IT WILL BE SUBJECT TO BEING STRICKEN, OR THE COURT IN ITS DISCRETION MAY IMPOSE OTHER SANCTIONS. APPELLANT IS ADVISED THAT NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT A DETAILED EXPLANATION FOR WHY THE REPLY BRIEF HAS NOT YET BEEN FILED AND A SHOWING OF EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE, IF A FURTHER EXTENSION IS NOT GRANTED, IRREPARABLE AND MATERIAL HARM WILL RESULT TO THE LITIGANT. ATTORNEY WORKLOAD DOES NOT CONSTITUTE EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH JUSTIFIES A FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: SFR SERVICES, LLC

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT'S AUGUST 8, 2025 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND APPELLANT SHALL SERVE THE INITIAL BRIEF ON OR BEFORE AUGUST 14, 2025. IN ADDITION, IF THE INITIAL BRIEF IS NOT SERVED WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED FOR IN THIS ORDER, THE ABOVE-STYLED CASE MAY BE SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL OR THE COURT IN ITS DISCRETION MAY IMPOSE OTHER SANCTIONS.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO FILE REPLY; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLEES ARE DIRECTED TO REPLY, WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, TO APPELLANTS' SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 RESPONSE TO AUGUST 28, 2025 ORDER AND SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF.

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO AUGUST 28, 2025 ORDER AND APPELLANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR RELIEF; ON BEHALF OF: LI *W*, MEI

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: CTY FARMS, LLC

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT'S SEPTEMBER 9, 2025 MOTION TO FILE CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF IS GRANTED. APPELLANT SHALL FILE THE CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF WITHIN TWO (2) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ORAL ARGUMENT; SUBTYPE: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: APPENDIX TO INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPENDIX TO INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: THE SHOWROOM CORP.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: THE SHOWROOM CORP.

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEY FEES; ON BEHALF OF: ZETLIN, MICHAEL S.

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: APPENDIX TO MOTION; DESCRIPTION: APPENDIX TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES; ON BEHALF OF: ZETLIN, MICHAEL S.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: PEREZ, MICHAEL

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT MICHAEL PEREZ'S MAY 14, 2025 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED IN PART, AND APPELLANT SHALL SERVE THE REPLY BRIEF WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FROM THE CURRENT DUE DATE. IN ADDITION, IF THE REPLY BRIEF IS SERVED AFTER THE TIME PROVIDED FOR IN THIS ORDER, IT MAY BE STRICKEN.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES' JULY 14, 2025 JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF APPEAL IS GRANTED, AND THIS CASE IS STAYED THROUGH SEPTEMBER 25, 2025.

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; DESCRIPTION: JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF APPEAL

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: RISK MANAGEMENT ADVISORY GROUP, LLC

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: FAMILY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: IT'S A NEW 10, LLC

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: IT'S A NEW 10, LLC

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: THIS CASE IS SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2025, AT 10:00 A.M. FOR 15 MINUTES PER SIDE, IN PERSON AT THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL COURTHOUSE. IF A SIDE ANTICIPATES MORE THAN TWO ATTORNEYS SITTING AT COUNSEL TABLE DURING ORAL ARGUMENT, IT SHALL CONTACT THE MARSHAL'S OFFICE BY PHONE AT LEAST TWO BUSINESS DAYS BEFORE THE ORAL ARGUMENT SESSION. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT 4DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. IN CRIMINAL CASES WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E) OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6) OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, THE STATE SHALL PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE OR TIME.

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ORAL ARGUMENT; SUBTYPE: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: URBN FLAGLER, LLC

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS; ON BEHALF OF: INDIAN TRAIL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: A FINAL APPEAL FROM THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT JOINT REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS; ON BEHALF OF: MINTO PBLH, LLC

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER DISPENSING WITH ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: AFTER REVIEWING THE BRIEFS, THE COURT, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.320, HAS DISPENSED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT. THE CASE WILL BE SUBMITTED TO A CONFERENCE BY A PANEL OF THE COURT.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT'S JUNE 3 AND 5, 2025 MOTIONS FOR CLARIFICATION ARE GRANTED. FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.210(2)(B) PROVIDES THAT " COMPUTER-GENERATED BRIEFS MUST NOT EXCEED THE WORD COUNT LIMITS OF THIS SUBDIVISION. HANDWRITTEN OR TYPEWRITTEN BRIEFS MUST NOT EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITS OF THIS SUBDIVISION. . . . THE REPLY BRIEF MUST NOT EXCEED 4,000 WORDS OR 15 PAGES." APPELLANT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITED WORD COUNT.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER DISPENSING WITH ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: AFTER REVIEWING THE BRIEFS, THE COURT, PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.320, HAS DISPENSED WITH ORAL ARGUMENT. THE CASE WILL BE SUBMITTED TO A CONFERENCE BY A PANEL OF THE COURT.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: FOX, FARRAH

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION TO CERTIFY; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLANT'S AUGUST 22, 2025 MOTION TO CERTIFY TO THE SUPREME COURT IS DENIED.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT, UPON CONSIDERATION OF APPELLEE'S SEPTEMBER 3, 2025 RESPONSE, COUNSEL IS ADVISED THAT FUTURE FILINGS WHICH DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE FONT REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.045(B) WILL BE STRICKEN. SEE FLA. R. APP. P. 9.045(B) ("COMPUTER-GENERATED DOCUMENTS SHALL BE FILED IN EITHER ARIAL 14-POINT FONT OR BOOKMAN OLD STYLE 14-POINT FONT.").

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ORDERED THAT APPELLEE'S SEPTEMBER 16, 2024 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND APPELLEE SHALL SERVE THE ANSWER BRIEF WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IN ADDITION, APPELLEE IS NOTIFIED THAT THE FAILURE TO SERVE THE BRIEF WITHIN THE TIME PROVIDED HEREIN WILL FORECLOSE APPELLEE'S RIGHT TO FILE A BRIEF OR OTHERWISE PARTICIPATE IN THIS APPEAL, OR THE COURT IN ITS DISCRETION MAY IMPOSE OTHER SANCTIONS. APPELLEE IS ADVISED THAT NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED ABSENT A DETAILED EXPLANATION FOR WHY THE ANSWER BRIEF HAS NOT YET BEEN FILED AND A SHOWING OF EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE, IF A FURTHER EXTENSION IS NOT GRANTED, IRREPARABLE AND MATERIAL HARM WILL RESULT TO THE LITIGANT. ATTORNEY WORKLOAD DOES NOT CONSTITUTE EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH JUSTIFIES A FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: UNIVERSAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 10-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF