Second District Court of Appeal Court Records

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ORAL ARGUMENT; SUBTYPE: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; ON BEHALF OF: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.

TYPE: DISPOSITION BY OPINION; SUBTYPE: AFFIRMED; DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED

OPINION; NOTE: AFFIRMED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF LOWER COURT HEARING THAT MAY AFFECT THE INSTANT PROCEEDING; ON BEHALF OF: SMITH, MARY ELIZABETH

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: MAIL RETURNED; DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED - JULY 2, 2025 ORDER RETURNED; UNABLE TO FORWARD.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; ON BEHALF OF: THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY'SFEES PURSUANT TO RULE 9.400; ON BEHALF OF: CENTAURI SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; ON BEHALF OF: BATTAGLIA, BRIANNA

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: APPENDIX TO RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPENDIX TO RESPONSE; ON BEHALF OF: HAEMMELMANN, KEITH, DR.

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION; ON BEHALF OF: HAEMMELMANN, KEITH, DR.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: BRANDON CROSSROADS BOWL, INC.

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEES' MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS; ON BEHALF OF: BRANDON CROSSROADS BOWL, INC.

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT-VIDEO CONFERENCE; DESCRIPTION: THIS CASE IS PROVISIONALLY SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON OCTOBER 14, 2025, AT 11:00 AM, BEFORE: JUDGE PATRICIA J. KELLY, JUDGE EDWARD C. LAROSE, JUDGE ROBERT J. MORRIS. THE ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE CONDUCTED BY VIDEO CONFERENCE. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT HTTPS://2DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. COUNSEL OR PARTIES ARE REQUESTED TO SIGN IN BY FIFTEEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE TIME LISTED ABOVE. THE PANEL IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. SHOULD THE ASSIGNED PANEL OF JUDGES DECIDE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT BENEFIT FROM ORAL ARGUMENT, THE ATTORNEYS OR PARTIES WILL BE NOTIFIED BY ORDER NO LESS THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE. IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E), FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6), THE STATE IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE. PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THAT FOLLOWS THIS ORDER. WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ANY ATTORNEY OR PARTY WHO WILL BE PRESENTING ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THE CLERK OF THE COURT WITH THE EMAIL ADDRESS WHERE THE VIDEO INVITATION SHOULD BE SENT AND A TELEPHONE NUMBER. THIS INFORMATION MAY BE SENT BY EMAIL TO 2DCACLERK@FLCOURTS.ORG. THE CLERK OF THE COURT WILL PROVIDE EACH PARTICIPANT WITH CONNECTION INSTRUCTIONS, INCLUDING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A TEST SESSION, BEFORE THE ARGUMENT.

TYPE: DISPOSITION BY OPINION; SUBTYPE: AFFIRMED; DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED

OPINION; NOTE: AFFIRMED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 10 - AB DUE 10/02/2025; ON BEHALF OF: SIERRA, GINA

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; ON BEHALF OF: SIERRA, GINA

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT-VIDEO CONFERENCE; DESCRIPTION: THIS CASE IS PROVISIONALLY SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON OCTOBER 14, 2025, AT 9:30 AM, BEFORE: JUDGE PATRICIA J. KELLY, JUDGE EDWARD C. LAROSE, JUDGE ROBERT J. MORRIS. THE ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE CONDUCTED BY VIDEO CONFERENCE. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT HTTPS://2DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. COUNSEL OR PARTIES ARE REQUESTED TO SIGN IN BY FIFTEEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE TIME LISTED ABOVE. THE PANEL IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. SHOULD THE ASSIGNED PANEL OF JUDGES DECIDE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT BENEFIT FROM ORAL ARGUMENT, THE ATTORNEYS OR PARTIES WILL BE NOTIFIED BY ORDER NO LESS THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE. IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E), FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6), THE STATE IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE. PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THAT FOLLOWS THIS ORDER. WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ANY ATTORNEY OR PARTY WHO WILL BE PRESENTING ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THE CLERK OF THE COURT WITH THE EMAIL ADDRESS WHERE THE VIDEO INVITATION SHOULD BE SENT AND A TELEPHONE NUMBER. THIS INFORMATION MAY BE SENT BY EMAIL TO 2DCACLERK@FLCOURTS.ORG. THE CLERK OF THE COURT WILL PROVIDE EACH PARTICIPANT WITH CONNECTION INSTRUCTIONS, INCLUDING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A TEST SESSION, BEFORE THE ARGUMENT.

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR REHEARING, FOR REHEARING EN BANC, AND FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A WRITEN OPINION; ON BEHALF OF: TOLLI, M.D., P.A., THOMAS C.

TYPE: POST-DISPOSITION MOTIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC; ON BEHALF OF: BOLLIGER, ALDO

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: HUBBARD, MACKENZIE

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND THE ANSWER BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED BY SEPTEMBER 10, 2025.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND THE REPLY BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED BY OCTOBER 3, 2025. HOWEVER, FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ARE UNLIKELY TO RECEIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION.

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: EVANS, THERESA

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT-VIDEO CONFERENCE; DESCRIPTION: THIS CASE IS PROVISIONALLY SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON SEPTEMBER 17, 2025, AT 09:30 AM, BEFORE: JUDGE ANTHONY K. BLACK, JUDGE J. ANDREW ATKINSON, JUDGE ANDREA T. SMITH. THE ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE CONDUCTED BY VIDEO CONFERENCE. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT HTTPS://2DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. COUNSEL OR PARTIES ARE REQUESTED TO SIGN IN BY FIFTEEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE TIME LISTED ABOVE. THE PANEL IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. SHOULD THE ASSIGNED PANEL OF JUDGES DECIDE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT BENEFIT FROM ORAL ARGUMENT, THE ATTORNEYS OR PARTIES WILL BE NOTIFIED BY ORDER NO LESS THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE. IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E), FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6), THE STATE IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE. PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THAT FOLLOWS THIS ORDER. WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, ANY ATTORNEY OR PARTY WHO WILL BE PRESENTING ARGUMENT IS REQUESTED TO PROVIDE THE CLERK OF THE COURT WITH THE EMAIL ADDRESS WHERE THE VIDEO INVITATION SHOULD BE SENT AND A TELEPHONE NUMBER. THIS INFORMATION MAY BE SENT BY EMAIL TO 2DCACLERK@FLCOURTS.ORG. THE CLERK OF THE COURT WILL PROVIDE EACH PARTICIPANT WITH CONNECTION INSTRUCTIONS, INCLUDING THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A TEST SESSION, BEFORE THE ARGUMENT.

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: STATUS REPORT; DESCRIPTION: STATUS REPORT

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO FILE STATUS REPORT; DESCRIPTION: COURT REPORTER STENO COURT REPORTING (6TH CIRCUIT) SHALL FILE A STATUS REPORT ON TRANSCRIPTION WITHIN 10 DAYS. THE COURT REPORTER SHALL CERTIFY SERVICE OF THE STATUS REPORT ON ALL PARTIES RECEIVING THIS ORDER.

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ORAL ARGUMENT; SUBTYPE: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: MOTION/REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT; ON BEHALF OF: BETTEN, MARK E.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: BETTEN, MARK E.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT/PETITIONER HAS INITIATED OVER TEN APPEALS OR ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT RELATING TO HIS DISPUTE WITH CHANDRA TUCKER, LINDA TUCKER, BASQUILL ROE, P.A., MICHAEL A. ROE, JOHN SHIM, M.D., JOHN H. SHIM, M.D., P.A., AND OTHER ENTITIES RELATED TO A SINGLE 2017 AUTO NEGLIGENCE LAWSUIT. THESE CASES STEMMED FROM HILLSBOROUGH CIRCUIT COURT CASE NUMBERS 2018-CA-3553, 22-CA-9303, AND 25-CA-0054. IN CASE 2D2020-1156, THIS COURT DENIED PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI REVIEW. IN CASES 2D2022-0039 AND 2D2024-2385, THIS COURT DENIED PETITIONER'S PETITIONS FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF THIS COURT'S DECISION IN 2D2022-0039 WAS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION IN CASE SC2022-0173. CASE NUMBERS 2D2022-3642 AND 2D2025-0097 WERE AFFIRMED PER CURIAM. APPELLANT/PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION IN CASE 2D2025-1618, PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN CASE 2D2025-1892, AND APPEAL OF A FINAL JUDGMENT IN CASE 2D2025-2098 ARE PENDING DISPOSITION. "[A]NY CITIZEN . . . ABUSES THE RIGHT TO PRO SE ACCESS BY FILING REPETITIOUS AND FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS, THEREBY DIMINISHING THE ABILITY OF THE COURTS TO DEVOTE THEIR FINITE RESOURCES TO THE CONSIDERATION OF LEGITIMATE CLAIMS." STATE V. SPENCER, 751 SO. 2D 47, 48 (FLA. 1999). APPELLANT/PETITIONER'S REPEATED MERITLESS FILINGS BURDEN THE LIMITED RESOURCES OF THIS COURT AND INTERFERE WITH THE RESOLUTION OF GENUINE DISPUTES. IN VIEW OF HIS NUMEROUS MERITLESS FILINGS, APPELLANT/PETITIONER SHALL SHOW CAUSE WITHIN TWENTY DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DIRECT THE CLERK OF THIS COURT TO REJECT ANY PLEADINGS RELATED TO THE LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NUMBERS IDENTIFIED IN THIS ORDER UNLESS THE FILING IS RELATED TO A PENDING CASE IN THIS COURT OR SUBMITTED BY A LICENSED FLORIDA ATTORNEY.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE OR ISSUE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE OR ISSUE; ON BEHALF OF: TUCKER, CHANDRA DENISE

TYPE: MOTIONS OTHER; SUBTYPE: MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION; DESCRIPTION: MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION; ON BEHALF OF: GLEASON, CHRISTOPHER

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: APPENDIX TO REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPENDIX TO REPLY; ON BEHALF OF: GLEASON, CHRISTOPHER

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: CRUM PROPERTIES II, LLC

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: APPENDIX TO ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPENDIX TO ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: CRUM PROPERTIES II, LLC

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER STRIKING FILING; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S AUGUST 11, 2025, MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE AND AUGUST 13, 2025, MOTION TO STAY APPEAL ARE DENIED. ON AUGUST 28, 2025, A MOTION TO STAY APPEAL WAS FILED ON APPELLANT'S BEHALF THROUGH THE FLORIDA COURTS E-FILING PORTAL. HOWEVER, APPELLANT HAS BEEN INCARCERATED SINCE AUGUST 21, 2025. PRISONERS DO NOT HAVE INTERNET ACCESS SUCH THAT THEY CAN FILE VIA THE FLORIDA COURTS E-FILING PORTAL, AND NONLAWYERS MAY NOT FILE ON BEHALF OF ANOTHER. ACCORDINGLY, THE AUGUST 28, 2025, MOTION FOR STAY IS STRICKEN. APPELLANT MUST SUBMIT ALL FILINGS VIA U.S. MAIL. APPELLANT MAY CHALLENGE THIS ORDER BY MOTION, FILED IN PAPER AND ATTACHING VERIFICATION OF INTERNET ACCESS FOR PRISONERS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS FACILITY WHERE APPELLANT IS HOUSED.

TYPE: MOTIONS OTHER; SUBTYPE: MOTION TO STAY; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS MOTION TO STAY APPEAL UNTIL RELATED CASES ARE COMPLETED; ON BEHALF OF: GILBERTI, JOSEPH D., JR.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEES' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND THE ANSWER BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED BY SEPTEMBER 19, 2025.

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: WHITE, TIFFANY

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 30 - AB DUE 10/06/2025; ON BEHALF OF: AJ THERAPY CENTER, INC.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND/CORRECT RECORD; DESCRIPTION: UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE CORRECTED RECORD FILED JULY 18, 2025, "APPELLEE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CORRECT THE RECORD ON APPEAL, AND FOR TIME EXTENSION TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF" IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT APPELLEE SHALL SERVE THE ANSWER BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: MISCELLANEOUS TRIAL COURT ORDER; DESCRIPTION: ORDER ON ROBERT CROSIER'S MOTION TO DISMISS/DISSOLVE WRIT OF GARNISHMENT; ON BEHALF OF: INMAN, RENEE L., HON.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S "MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION" IS DENIED, AND APPELLANT MAY SEEK CONSIDERATION OF HIS "MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.540," IF NECESSARY, AFTER DISPOSITION OF THIS APPEAL AND REMAND. SEE GORDON V. STATE, 585 SO. 2D 1033, 1038 (FLA. 3D DCA 1991). APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF AND THE DUPLICATE OF THAT MOTION ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF IS ACCEPTED AS TIMELY FILED.

TYPE: DISPOSITION BY ORDER; SUBTYPE: DISMISSED; DESCRIPTION: BECAUSE APPELLANT HAS NOT PROVIDED THIS COURT WITH AN APPEALABLE FINAL ORDER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURT'S AUGUST 13, 2025, ORDER, THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS FROM A NONFINAL, NONAPPEALABLE ORDER. APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS DENIED AS MOOT. KELLY, BLACK, AND ATKINSON, JJ., CONCUR.

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: STATUS REPORT; DESCRIPTION: STATUS REPORT; ON BEHALF OF: SMITH, ARTHUR EDWARD

DESCRIPTION: NOTICE; FILED BY: BRYAN D. HULL, ESQ. 20969; NOTES: NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION TO RELINQUISH JURISDICTION OR, ALTERNATIVELY, STAY APPEAL PENDING RECONSIDERATION BY THE TRIAL COURT

DESCRIPTION: MISCELLANEOUS ORDER; NOTES: ATTORNEYS STEPHEN SHACKELFORD, HALEY STILLWELL, AND HALLEY JOSEPHS ARE REMOVEDFROM THIS PROCEEDING.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND THE REPLY BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED BY SEPTEMBER 30, 2025. HOWEVER, FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME ARE UNLIKELY TO RECEIVE FAVORABLE CONSIDERATION.

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: ROMERO GARCIA, LENNIN E. ROMERO

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: OBJECTION; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' OPPOSITION TO APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AS MOOT; OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH VACATUR OF THE MAY 1, 2025 ORDER; ON BEHALF OF: RUIZ, YASMINA MORALES

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS SHALL SERVE A RESPONSE TO THE "MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AS MOOT" WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: BERNSTEIN, JACK G.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: HOOKS, MIGUEL

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE; DESCRIPTION: ATTORNEY TROY A. PRICE'S MOTION TO APPEAR AS A FOREIGN ATTORNEY IN THIS PROCEEDING IS GRANTED. ALL PARTIES MUST SERVE SPONSORING FLORIDA ATTORNEY ANTWAN D. PHILLIPS WITH ALL SUBMISSIONS WHEN SERVING FOREIGN ATTORNEY TROY A. PRICE WITH DOCUMENTS.

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; ON BEHALF OF: STEWART, BRYAN

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: AMENDED REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: AMENDED REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS; ON BEHALF OF: SARASOTA COUNTY PUBLIC HOSPITAL DISTRICT

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANTS' SECOND MOTION TO STRIKE BRIEFING RECORD BASED ON NEW EVIDENCE IS DENIED.

TYPE: MOTIONS OTHER; SUBTYPE: MOTION TO STRIKE; DESCRIPTION: SECOND MOTION TO STRIKE BRIEFING RECORD BASED ON NEW EVIDENCE; ON BEHALF OF: WASHINGTON, MICHAEL

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: THIS CASE IS PROVISIONALLY SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON NOVEMBER 7, 2025, AT 09:30 AM, BEFORE: JUDGE MATTHEW C. LUCAS, JUDGE DANIEL H. SLEET, JUDGE SUSAN H. ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM. ORAL ARGUMENT WILL OCCUR IN SARASOTA COUNTY COMMISSION CHAMBERS, 4000 SOUTH TAMIAMI TRAIL, VENICE, FLORIDA. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT HTTPS://2DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. COUNSEL OR PARTIES ARE REQUESTED TO MAKE THEIR PRESENCE KNOWN TO COURT PERSONNEL BY FIFTEEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE TIME LISTED ABOVE. THE PANEL IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. SHOULD THE ASSIGNED PANEL OF JUDGES DECIDE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT BENEFIT FROM ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING, THE ATTORNEYS OR PARTIES WILL BE NOTIFIED BY ORDER NO LESS THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE. IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E), FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6), THE STATE IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE. PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THAT FOLLOWS THIS ORDER.

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: STATUS REPORT; DESCRIPTION: STATUS REPORT; ON BEHALF OF: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEVELOPERS, INC.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER TO FILE STATUS REPORT; DESCRIPTION: WITHIN 10 DAYS APPELLANT SHALL FILE A STATUS REPORT ON THE MOTION(S) TOLLING RENDITION.

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS; ON BEHALF OF: UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; ON BEHALF OF: UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE CO.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: REPLY BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: REPLY BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: SHEIK ISLAND FARM, INC.

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: COVINGTON FARM, INC.

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: MAIL RETURNED; DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED - 98 STREET NORTH LAND TRUST - VACANT

TYPE: MISCELLANEOUS DOCUMENT; SUBTYPE: MAIL RETURNED; DESCRIPTION: MAIL RETURNED - 61 STREET NORTH LAND TRUST - 9/9/25 ORDER - VACANT

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: INXS VI, LLC

TYPE: MOTIONS RELATING TO ATTORNEY FEES/COSTS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEES' MOTION FOR APPELLATE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES/SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 57.105 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES; ON BEHALF OF: INXS VI, LLC

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: ORDER APPEALED; DESCRIPTION: ORDER APPEALED; ON BEHALF OF: ALTON, MICHAEL

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER BANKRUPTCY; DESCRIPTION: IN LIGHT OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT'S APRIL 24, 2025, "ORDER DISMISSING CASE," THIS APPEAL WILL PROCEED. APPELLANT SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ORDER APPEALED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER OR THIS CASE WILL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 45 - AB DUE 10/21/2025; ON BEHALF OF: MORALES, SALVADOR

TYPE: BRIEF; SUBTYPE: INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: THURMAN, MONTONIA

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: MISC. EVENTS; SUBTYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT DATE SET; DESCRIPTION: ORAL ARGUMENT DATE SET

TYPE: DISPOSITION BY OPINION; SUBTYPE: AFFIRMED; DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED

OPINION; NOTE: AFFIRMED

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INITIAL BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: JARAMILLO, GISELA MARIA

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER STRIKING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION; DESCRIPTION: THE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED BY JON JOHNSON ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2025, IS STRICKEN. THE EXTENSION AGREED UPON EXCEEDS THE AGGREGATE TIME PERIODS OUTLINED IN THE FINAL PARAGRAPH OF THIS COURT'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2013-1.

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED, AND THE ANSWER BRIEF SHALL BE SERVED BY OCTOBER 6, 2025.

TYPE: MOTIONS EXTENSIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE ANSWER BRIEF; ON BEHALF OF: VALADIE, M. D., ALAN

TYPE: POST-DISPOSITION MOTIONS; SUBTYPE: MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC; DESCRIPTION: MOTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC WITH WRITTEN OPINION; ON BEHALF OF: ANDERSON, ERIC

TYPE: DISPOSITION BY OPINION; SUBTYPE: AFFIRMED; DESCRIPTION: AFFIRMED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF APPEARANCE; ON BEHALF OF: CCP HARBOUR ISLAND, LLC.,

TYPE: ORDER; SUBTYPE: ORDER RE STAY; DESCRIPTION: APPELLANT'S "MOTION TO LIFT STAY BASED UPON DISPOSITION OF TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION" IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT THIS APPEAL IS NO LONGER HELD IN ABEYANCE AND SHALL PROCEED.

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 30 - ANSWER/CROSS-INITIAL BRIEF DUE 09/29/2025; ON BEHALF OF: REIN, MICHAEL

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - INITIAL BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 60 DAYS - AB/XIB DUE ON 08/29/25; ON BEHALF OF: REIN, MICHAEL

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF AGREED EXTENSION OF TIME - ANSWER BRIEF; DESCRIPTION: 30 DAYS - AB DUE ON 10/13/25; ON BEHALF OF: JOHNSON, RACHEL

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE OR ISSUE; DESCRIPTION: NOTICE OF RELATED CASE OR ISSUE; ON BEHALF OF: JOHNSON, RACHEL

TYPE: RESPONSE; SUBTYPE: RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPELLEES' RESPONSE TO AUGUST 22, 2025 ORDER; ON BEHALF OF: MILLS, LEN

TYPE: RECORD; SUBTYPE: APPENDIX TO RESPONSE; DESCRIPTION: APPENDIX TO RESPONSE; ON BEHALF OF: MILLS, LEN

TYPE: ORAL ARGUMENT; STATUS: SCHEDULED

TYPE: NOTICE; SUBTYPE: NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT; DESCRIPTION: THIS CASE IS PROVISIONALLY SET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON NOVEMBER 5, 2025, AT 09:30 AM, BEFORE: JUDGE EDWARD C. LAROSE, JUDGE ANTHONY K. BLACK, JUDGE ANDREA T. SMITH. ORAL ARGUMENT WILL OCCUR AT THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, IN THE COURTROOM OF THE STETSON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF LAW, TAMPA CAMPUS, FIRST FLOOR, 1700 NORTH TAMPA STREET, TAMPA, FLORIDA. THE COURT CALENDARS CAN BE VIEWED ON THIS COURT'S WEBSITE AT HTTPS://2DCA.FLCOURTS.GOV. COUNSEL OR PARTIES ARE REQUESTED TO MAKE THEIR PRESENCE KNOWN TO COURT PERSONNEL BY FIFTEEN MINUTES PRIOR TO THE TIME LISTED ABOVE. THE PANEL IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. SHOULD THE ASSIGNED PANEL OF JUDGES DECIDE THAT THE COURT WILL NOT BENEFIT FROM ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING, THE ATTORNEYS OR PARTIES WILL BE NOTIFIED BY ORDER NO LESS THAN TWO WEEKS BEFORE THE SCHEDULED DATE. IF THIS IS A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WHERE A VICTIM, AS DEFINED IN ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(E), FLORIDA CONSTITUTION, HAS INVOKED THEIR RIGHT TO NOTICE UNDER ARTICLE I, SECTION 16(B)(6), THE STATE IS DIRECTED TO PROVIDE THE VICTIM WITH NOTICE OF THIS ORAL ARGUMENT AND OF ANY CHANGES TO THE SCHEDULED DATE. PLEASE REVIEW THE NOTICE REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THAT FOLLOWS THIS ORDER.